That's a very interesting question! It's true that low-mass stars are the most common type of stars in the universe. But, to say they are the "most common type of stars" is a bit misleading. Here's why:

* Stars vs. Stellar Mass: It's important to distinguish between the number of stars and their individual masses. While low-mass stars are far more numerous, they are also significantly less massive than their high-mass counterparts.

* Total Mass Dominance: Even though there are many more low-mass stars, the total mass of all the stars in a galaxy is dominated by the high-mass stars. These massive stars are much rarer, but they are incredibly dense and contain significantly more mass.

So, to answer your question directly:

* Most Numerous: Yes, low-mass stars are the most numerous type of star in the universe.

* Most Massive: No, high-mass stars hold the majority of the total stellar mass in a galaxy.

Think of it like this: Imagine a classroom with 100 students, but 90 of them are small children and 10 are tall adults. Even though there are far more children, the adults likely weigh more overall. The same principle applies to stars and their distribution across the universe.