Australians may have to choose between saving the Great Barrier Reef and meeting their climate targets. The Great Barrier Reef is a World Heritage Site and one of the most iconic natural wonders of the world. It is home to a diverse range of marine life and is a major tourist destination. However, the reef is under threat from climate change, which is causing the ocean to warm and become more acidic. This is bleaching the coral and causing it to die.

The Australian government has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2030. However, experts say that this will not be enough to save the Great Barrier Reef. They say that emissions need to be reduced by at least 45% by 2030 in order to give the reef a chance of survival.

The government is facing a difficult decision. On the one hand, it is committed to protecting the environment. On the other hand, it is also committed to economic growth and jobs. The tourism industry, which is heavily reliant on the Great Barrier Reef, employs thousands of people and contributes billions of dollars to the Australian economy.

The government has a number of options to choose from. It could reduce emissions by investing in renewable energy and phasing out fossil fuels. It could also provide financial assistance to businesses and individuals who are affected by the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Ultimately, the decision of how to save the Great Barrier Reef is a political one. The government will need to weigh the costs and benefits of different options and decide what is in the best interests of the Australian people.