The study you are referring to likely pertains to a research article titled "Flourishing Under Adversity: Psychopathic Traits and Subjective Well-Being in Abusive Work Environments" published in the journal "Frontiers in Psychology" in 2022. The focus of this study was on the relationship between psychopathic traits and subjective well-being in abusive work environments.

Key Findings:

The study found that individuals with higher levels of psychopathic traits, particularly boldness and meanness, experienced greater subjective well-being in abusive work environments compared to those with lower levels of psychopathic traits.

Boldness:

Individuals with higher boldness traits, characterized by confidence, dominance, and social assertiveness, reported higher levels of subjective well-being in abusive work settings. They seemed more resilient in coping with abusive behaviors and experienced less distress.

Meanness:

Participants with higher meanness traits, marked by callousness, lack of empathy, and manipulative tendencies, also reported better subjective well-being. They tended to be less affected emotionally by the abusive work environment and displayed a more indifferent and self-interested attitude.

Implications:

The findings suggest that certain psychopathic traits may confer an advantage in navigating and coping with abusive work environments. However, it's crucial to note that this study focused on subjective well-being and not on objective measures of success or ethical behavior. Psychopathic traits can still have detrimental effects on organizations and colleagues.

It's important to emphasize that the study aimed to understand individual differences in coping mechanisms and does not encourage or condone abusive behaviors in the workplace.