The statement "Physicists are born and not made" is an oversimplification and a misconception. While some innate qualities might be helpful for a career in physics, it's absolutely not true that one must be born a physicist.

Here's why:

* Oversimplified: It ignores the enormous role of hard work, dedication, and education in becoming a physicist. Even with a natural inclination towards science, achieving success in physics requires years of rigorous study, research, and problem-solving.

* Misleading: This statement can discourage people who are passionate about physics but don't feel they have a "natural talent" for it. It reinforces the stereotype of "geniuses" in science, ignoring the fact that many successful physicists have overcome challenges and developed their skills through hard work.

* Ignores the Importance of Environment and Opportunity: Access to quality education, supportive mentors, and a stimulating research environment are crucial factors in developing a successful physics career. These factors are often influenced by socioeconomic background and access to resources.

Instead of "born and not made," a more accurate perspective would be:

* Natural curiosity and a passion for understanding the universe are important foundations for a successful physics career.

* Hard work, dedication, and a strong work ethic are essential for mastering the complex concepts and challenges of physics.

* A supportive environment with access to quality education and mentorship is crucial for developing the skills and knowledge needed to excel in the field.

In conclusion, becoming a physicist is a journey that requires both innate talent and hard work. It's important to remember that everyone has the potential to learn and contribute to the field of physics with dedication and passion.