Science relies heavily on empirical evidence, which is information gathered through observation and experimentation. This is the core of the scientific method, and it sets science apart from other disciplines like history and art.

Here's a breakdown:

* Science:

* Empirical evidence: Science relies on observable, measurable data obtained through experiments and observation. Theories are constantly tested and refined based on this evidence.

* Objectivity: Science strives for objectivity, meaning it aims to minimize bias and personal interpretation in data collection and analysis.

* Falsifiability: Scientific theories must be able to be proven wrong. If a theory can't be tested, it is not considered scientific.

* History:

* Primary sources: Historical research often relies on primary sources like letters, diaries, and artifacts, but these sources can be subjective and require interpretation.

* Interpretation: History involves a significant degree of interpretation of events and sources, which can vary between historians.

* Subjectivity: Even though historians strive for objectivity, there is always a degree of personal interpretation and bias that can influence historical narratives.

* Art:

* Subjectivity: Art is highly subjective, relying on personal interpretation, emotion, and experience.

* Expression: Art is primarily concerned with expressing ideas, emotions, and experiences rather than seeking objective truth.

* Creativity: Art relies heavily on imagination and creativity, and there are no fixed rules or methods for creating art.

In summary:

Science relies on empirical evidence and rigorous testing to build knowledge. History relies on primary sources and interpretation to understand the past. Art relies on subjectivity, expression, and creativity. While all three disciplines can inform and enrich each other, they operate with different methodologies and goals.