While continental drift is a well-established theory, paleoclimatic evidence doesn't directly support it. The theory of plate tectonics, of which continental drift is a part, is supported by a wide range of evidence, including:

* Fossil distribution: The presence of identical fossils on continents now separated by vast oceans strongly suggests they were once joined.

* Rock formations: Matching rock formations, including mountain ranges and geological structures, are found on different continents, indicating a shared past.

* Paleomagnetism: The study of the Earth's magnetic field preserved in rocks reveals how continents have moved over millions of years.

* Seafloor spreading: The discovery of mid-ocean ridges and the associated magnetic striping pattern provide direct evidence of plate movement.

Paleoclimatic evidence, while interesting, doesn't directly prove continental drift:

* Glacial deposits: Glacial deposits found on continents now in tropical regions suggest they were once located closer to the poles. This supports the idea of continental movement, but doesn't directly demonstrate the mechanism.

* Coal deposits: Coal deposits found in Antarctica, currently a frozen continent, suggest a warmer past climate. This could be explained by continental drift, but it's not definitive proof.

* Fossil climates: Fossil evidence can reveal ancient climates, such as the presence of tropical plants in polar regions. This aligns with the idea of continental movement, but doesn't offer a direct mechanism.

In summary: Paleoclimatic evidence provides indirect support for the idea of continental movement, but it's the combination of fossil evidence, rock formations, paleomagnetism, and seafloor spreading that forms the foundation of the theory of plate tectonics, which encompasses continental drift.