Here's why:
* Choropleth maps use different shades or patterns to represent data values within predefined areas (like park zones or grid squares). This allows for easy visualization of population density, with darker shades indicating areas with higher bear concentrations.
* Other map types might be less suitable:
* Dot maps would be difficult to use if population densities were very high, creating an overwhelming amount of dots.
* Isoline maps would only be useful if there were clear lines of demarcation between population densities, which is unlikely in a complex ecosystem like Glacier National Park.
By using a choropleth map, park managers and researchers can quickly and effectively communicate the distribution and density of grizzly bears within Glacier National Park, helping with conservation efforts and visitor safety.
