Venimo/Getty Images
A smile can seem simple, but clinical psychologist Paul Ekman identified 18 distinct types of genuine smiles—unforced expressions that reflect real emotions, primarily positive ones such as joy. Since 1967, Ekman’s research has expanded beyond these natural smiles to include the deceptive ones people use when lying.
False smiles often conceal negative emotions like anger, fear, or distress, allowing the wearer to appear happy in inappropriate contexts. Ekman’s work began after he observed patients in clinical settings denying depressive symptoms, only to later take their own lives. By reviewing video recordings, he detected subtle micro‑expressions that betrayed their inner turmoil.
In his book Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage, Ekman explains that people employ a smile mask for two main reasons: first, a sign of happiness can make a lie more believable; second, a smile has become a courteous greeting, so masking negative feelings with a smile is socially expected. This phenomenon is distinct from alexithymia, a condition that hampers emotional expression.
Lightkitegirl/Getty Images
Recognizing a fake smile is challenging because it shares traits with a genuine, Duchenne smile. Ekman notes that a true smile originates in the zygomatic major muscle, which pulls the corners of the mouth upward and lifts the cheeks. This action creates subtle crow‑foot lines around the eyes and a slight lowering of the eyebrows.
A fabricated smile also engages the zygomatic major, but it typically fails to produce the same cheek lift or eye creases. It is often asymmetrical, with only the lower facial muscles active. Signs of distress—such as furrowed brows or tension in the frontalis—may still appear, especially if the person is trying to conceal negative feelings. A fake smile may also fade abruptly or in stages, lacking the natural flow of genuine emotion.
Siberianart/Getty Images
Smile patterns are one of many cues researchers use to spot deception. A 2012 study in Evolution & Human Behavior examined video footage of individuals pleading for a missing relative. The researchers found that genuine mourners displayed increased activation of the corrugator supercilii and depressor anguli oris—muscles linked to grief—whereas deceivers showed a slight zygomatic major contraction and full frontalis activation.
While these muscular markers can hint at lying, they are not foolproof. A University of Rochester team leveraged artificial intelligence to analyze facial data, discovering that a high‑intensity Duchenne‑like smile correlated most strongly with deception. This aligns with Ekman’s concept of ‘duping delight’—the pleasure some feel when successfully deceiving.
Duplex delight—when a liar experiences excitement or relief—can leak through subtle changes in facial expression, sometimes pushing the individual toward increased risk or even confession. Understanding these nuances can help professionals, negotiators, and everyday observers better assess the authenticity of smiles.
