Here's a breakdown of what cladistic taxonomists do and don't compare:
Cladistic Taxonomists Compare:
* Shared derived characters: These are the most important for cladistic analysis. They indicate a close evolutionary relationship.
* Shared ancestral characters: These are traits that were present in a distant common ancestor. While they help establish a broader evolutionary context, they are less informative for determining specific relationships within a group.
Cladistic Taxonomists Do Not Compare:
* Overall similarity: Cladistics focuses on shared derived characters, not overall resemblance. Two organisms might share many superficial features without being closely related.
* Analogous structures: These are structures that have similar functions but different evolutionary origins. For example, the wings of a bat and the wings of a bird are analogous structures.
* Developmental patterns: While developmental data can provide insights, cladistics primarily relies on shared derived characters.
In summary: Cladistic taxonomists focus on shared derived characters to understand evolutionary relationships, rather than overall similarity, analogous structures, or developmental patterns.