Here's why:

* Inductive Reasoning: This involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or patterns. It moves from the specific to the general. For example, if you observe that every swan you've ever seen is white, you might induce that all swans are white. This is how scientists often form hypotheses.

* Example: Observing that several patients with a certain symptom have a specific genetic marker might lead to the hypothesis that this marker is associated with the symptom.

* Deductive Reasoning: This starts with a general statement or theory and applies it to a specific case to reach a conclusion. It moves from the general to the specific.

* Example: If you know that all mammals have fur and you know that a dolphin is a mammal, you can deduce that a dolphin has fur. Deductive reasoning is more commonly used to test existing hypotheses rather than forming new ones.

How Inductive Reasoning is Used to Form Hypotheses:

1. Observation: Scientists observe phenomena in the real world.

2. Pattern Recognition: They look for patterns or relationships within their observations.

3. Tentative Explanation: They develop a tentative explanation for the observed patterns. This explanation is the hypothesis.

Important Note: Inductive reasoning doesn't guarantee the truth of the hypothesis. It only suggests a possible explanation that needs further testing.

Let me know if you'd like more examples or want to discuss the limitations of inductive reasoning!