All of the following are red flags of inaccurate or exaggerated science:

* Lack of peer review: Scientific findings should be vetted by other experts in the field. If a study hasn't been peer-reviewed, it's more likely to contain errors or biases.

* Cherry-picking data: This involves selecting only the data that supports a pre-determined conclusion, while ignoring data that contradicts it.

* Overstating the significance of findings: Scientists may oversell their findings, making them sound more important than they actually are.

* Confusing correlation with causation: Just because two things happen at the same time doesn't mean one caused the other.

* Lack of credible sources: Reliable scientific information comes from reputable sources like academic journals, scientific societies, and government agencies. Be wary of websites or blogs that lack clear credentials.

* Using emotional appeals instead of evidence: Science should be based on facts, not feelings. If someone is trying to convince you of something by appealing to your emotions, it's a red flag.

* Making claims that are not supported by scientific consensus: Scientific consensus is built on years of research and evidence. Claims that contradict established consensus should be viewed with skepticism.

Important Note: This doesn't mean everything that has these red flags is automatically wrong. It means it should be examined carefully and critically.

Do you have a specific example in mind? If so, I can help you analyze it for red flags.