Here's why:
* Lack of Evidence: There is no observational evidence to support continuous creation. The Big Bang model, based on strong observational evidence, is the prevailing theory of the universe's origin.
* Contradictions with Established Laws: Continuous creation contradicts fundamental physical laws, such as the conservation of energy and momentum.
* Unpredictability: The theory doesn't offer any mechanism or prediction for the rate or location of new matter creation, making it difficult to test or falsify.
Therefore, there is no scientific consensus on the frequency of universe creation in this theory.
It's important to distinguish between scientific theories that are supported by evidence and those that are not. While some people may find the idea of continuous creation intriguing, it lacks the scientific backing necessary for serious consideration within mainstream cosmology.
